Everyone should protect their data.

fertieg97

Beijing on June 9, \IT industry can do about it?
Google has recently become the object of universal condemnation, because Google has never been found safe Wi-Fi network load on the collection of private data, and the street car navigation products are also products for its collection of geographical data. The official blog, Google acknowledged that the behavior of pure misunderstanding of data collection, the company has never used any of Google products to those data. Google added that it is only a small part of the collection of user load data. Nevertheless, many European governments and the United States have at least one state prosecutor on suspicion of invasion of privacy on the grounds of Google investigation.
Although I am sure Google would not condone the behavior, but I made Governments Google such a large response also feel a bit puzzled. This is what personal responsibility made the request? Everyone should protect their data.
After all, these data are publicly available (and not just Google), anyone can get if we really want to collect them. People do not steal other people houses or break the violence of others can get their network. My privacy if I will publish the information sign outside the house,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and street services, including the camera can shoot pictures that information,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], then I can say that Google infringes on my privacy it?
No one yet has accused Google user data for improper purposes. People blame the people that Google will save the information publicly available.
Bank has always insisted on a notion that banks and customers need to share the responsibility for check fraud prevention. If I lost a lot in public, signed his name on the blank check,Ylmf OS 3.0 is built based on Ubuntu 10.04, and there is no time to change my account instructions, nor will I estimate Bank money in his pocket.
I have a duty to take reasonable precautions to protect the safety of my checking account. This also applies to my wireless network. Similarly, the core issue of the lack of government investigation is a key component.
IT industry in this well enough, it did not allow people to easily protect their network security.
I am not network engineers, but I know the wireless network may be more than the average user. However, for multiple computers to create a secure wireless network access to me by no means an easy task.
Set interface has too many acronyms and technical terms, there are many selections, and usually those who choose to entry and no corresponding note.
Network engineer is to achieve a certain degree of professional users (such as their own) to set the design process, without considering the general user. In addition, the default settings are usually not safe options,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], which often will result in a general user problems. If the IT community because the users failed to protect the security of their networks and large plus ridicule, would be too hypocritical.
Fortunately, everything in the right direction. In the new computer operating system, set the network becomes easier than ever before. Valet from Cisco networking products,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],is a 3G phone supporting WCDMA networks., recently hit the TV advertising point of view, to set a secure wireless network seems to become very simple. Advertising is not only emphasized the simplicity of the network settings, but also suggests the use of its products to set the network is secure.
This concept is very good,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I believe that other manufacturers will release similar products.
We have a lot of work to do. The first is to teach people the need to ensure the security of their networks. The second is trying to get existing, insecure network have become secure network.